Journal Entry: Claudia De La Cruz Vs Donald Trump
I actually wanted to vote for Claudia De La Cruz but this election was too important and dangerous to take that chance. She was obviously the best candidate for the presidency in my opinion however, third-party candidates don’t make a lot of treadway in American elections. Unlike in other countries where each percentage of votes per party allow a certain number of delegates from each party to be represented in their government, the United States is still very much a bipartisan system of “winner takes all”. In other words, voting for a third-party candidate in American president elections only tends to take votes away from the main political parties, The Democrats and The Republicans. I knew Donald Trump’s administration would be a cross between the Nazis of 1933 Germany and the current Taliban fascist regime over Afghanistan so although I would’ve preferred Claudia, I knew this election was too important to risk voting for anyone but Kamala Harris. Hopefully in the future after we experience enough disaster and suffering under this current Trump administration, people will finally be more open to voting for third-party candidates.
After listening to both videos it was evident that Claudia’s argument was a call to action against neoliberal policies that are the main cause of hardship for majority of American citizens. Opposite to Trump, she argued that immigrants are not the cause of a loss of housing for Americans nor a loss of jobs since immigrants are not the ones who control real estate prices like banks do, they don’t control rent prices the way landlords do and they don’t control majority of residential property in the private corporate sector as a billionaire investor does. With this statement alone she pointed out that immigrants are not the cause for Americans woes but the obvious culprit of this dog-eat-dog world we have is capitalism.
Trump’s rhetoric took the opposite approach. His speech was simplistic yet persuasive, inciting a lot of emotions out of his intended audience, which the main one being fear. As a businessman and salesperson Trump knows that to get the deal, the way you made your client feel is more important than whatever it is you’re selling. Fear is a powerful emotion that can cloud judgement by activating the emotional threat detection response in the amygdala and shutting off the frontal lobe. When a person is in a state of fear, they may not make the most rational choices and be more impulsive based on the perceived heightened threat that their brain is being distracted by. Trump utilized fear as a main tool against his audience by preying on white mediocrity and the white working-class feelings of inadequacies, fear of losing jobs that they were never going to work in the first place and preying on their inherent racial biases. It wasn’t an argument based in facts but more of a sales pitch to convince his audience that somehow getting rid of immigrants will solve all their problems. Instead of addressing that capitalism is the main cause for the white working-class unemployment rate, he deflected and scapegoated immigrants since he is a billionaire who vehemently enjoys capitalism. Another reason his rhetoric is so powerful is because he had a show called “The Apprentice” and is also a wealthy “successful” real estate mogul. Based on this, his audience foolishly drinks the Kool-Aid and believes that Trump will be able to provide more jobs.
A major point Claudia made that debunks the conservatives lies about immigrants is that the reason we have people coming here as refugees is because of American imperialism and warfare caused by the United States in their countries. America creates refugees so of course as a form of reparations it is the most logical to allow immigrants to seek asylum, housing and education in America considering America is who destroyed their homes. Why would we not make things right with the people we have wronged? Why would we have an issue with allowing immigrants to come here when we are the primary reason they are even coming here to begin with? As Claudia stated, the United States has caused Cuba to lose over $90 billion throughout the years. Imagine causing countries to go bankrupt from exploiting their labor and natural resources for personal gain then denying them access into the country that looted THEIR country to begin with. She also stated in the video that “they are following the trail of what was stolen from them”.
Claudia’s argument was based in fact and although she was persuasive she didn’t come across as disingenuous or manipulative the way Trump did. In fact, opposite to Trump she preached about unity and organization to fight against the divisive identity politics that Trump so often weaponizes against his uneducated racist audience. She spoke about how immigrants, LGBTQ, black people, women/feminists, Muslims and all groups of people need to come together and fight against the capitalist oligarch that is causing all our problems. She emphasizes how not to fall into the trap of Trump’s divisive rhetoric and focuses on the facts, not by using deceptive language. Trump wasn’t using factual information; he was instead calling the conservatives the party of “common sense” while not exhibiting any signs of common sense throughout his entire speech. The crowd cheered because Trump stroked their egos by making them feel like they are the ones with “common sense” while the rest of us who don’t agree are not as bright. Again, Trump knows it’s not about being honest or factual but how you can make the intended target feel emotionally that will ultimately win them over. Sadly, humans are more emotional than logical and that weak point in many Americans is what Trump used to his advantage.